January 12, 2018
MY CORNER by Boyd Cathey
Hitting Back at the Amnesty Crowd: President Trump was Exactly Right in What He Said: We Don't Want or Need More Immigrants from Failed and Dysfunctional Countries
Friends,
Leave
it up to South Carolina’s US Senator Lindsey Graham to make anything “rough”—any
off-color language—that President Trump says, sound totally justified. That’s
exactly what happened yesterday that has the entirety of the mainstream media, including
Fox News, all atwitter about one barnyard word that the president supposedly used
(in what was ostensibly a private
meeting with a small group of pro-amnesty senators, including Graham).
Yes,
the media would have us believe that it was the president’s reported use of
that word—“s---hole”—as applied to certain countries that illustrates how
uncouth, how “tone deaf,” how “unfit” the president is. Confronted in the meeting
by a “bipartisan” group of three Democrat (notably Dick Durbin) and three GOP
senators (Graham, Jeff Flake, and Cory Gardner of Colorado)—all of whom are
pro-amnesty, open border zealots—who presented to him a “compromise” on illegal
immigration that basically would wave a magic wand and “normalize” the DACA
recipients and other illegals, including providing a “pathway to citizenship,” and
open the doors to immigration from Latin America and Africa (including
citizenship)—given these rehashed, warmed over snake-oil proposals (that
Graham, Flake and Durbin have been selling since the infamous and abortive “gang
of eight” proposals years ago), President Trump reacted very negatively and with
both frustration and legitimate disgust. He flatly rejected the
Graham-Flake-Durbin “compromise.”
“Why
do we always favor immigration from ‘s---hole’
countries,” he fumed. “Why can’t we have
more immigrants from countries like, say, Norway?”
It
was a private meeting, a meeting between Trump and those six pro-amnesty
senators. It was, to be precise, off the record. But no sooner had he vented
his frustration in language that none of us probably would have used publicly
or at a church meeting, than one of the senators (or senator’s aides) had, of
course, “leaked” it to the avariciously anti-Trump media. You would have
thought that those media announcers and pundits had just returned from an
Evangelical revival meeting where they had all been “saved” and “washed in the
Blood.” Or, that they were burnishing their memberships in the Womens’
Christian Temperance Union! The shock—the disgust—the horror—of hearing such a
word uttered by the president! You just know that they have never heard such words before, that they’ve
never watched HBO or Showtime or tuned into primetime television, or listened
to the lyrics of many of the top rap songs playing incessantly on our radio
stations….None those pure-as-the-driven-snow pundits would ever do that!
But
it was not just that: no, for the media, the Democrats, and all sorts
of bawling and scaredy-cat Republicans always on guard to avoid the fearsome charge
of “racism,” it was the explicit and odious comparison between very successful countries
(such as mostly white Norway) and failed states (such as mostly black Haiti)
that revealed, once again for all to see, that deep, dark and dank “racist”
mentality of Donald J. Trump! How dare he compare a Norway to a Haiti!
All
the Social Justice Warriors (SJW) and professional anti-hate and anti-racist
organizations jumped into the fray and into immediate action furiously
releasing press releases and going on CNN, MSNBC and NBC to denounce in
dripping scorn the president’s “racist sin.” Overseas, craven
politically-correct, brain-dead leaders—our supposed allies—joined the mob.
Saddiq Khan, mayor of the Peoples’ Democratic Socialist Commune of Londonistan
(AKA, London), excoriated the president in his strongest, puffed up anti-racist
“moralizing” terms.
Once
again, just as after Charlottesville, President Trump had rubbed a nerve and stated
a truth—a truth that even the most enmeshed-in-Marxist-muck SJWs would have to
admit, were that SJW to be truly honest:
while Norway is a successful constitutional monarchy, a nation where public
order and law govern, where most citizens are gainfully employed and the social
and political fabric is stable—countries like Haiti (and various countries in
Africa that the “group of six” wanted the president to favor) are failed and
dysfunctional states, wracked by intense poverty, characterized by social and
political disorder, with raging and
unchecked criminality and an almost total lack of the necessary infrastructure
necessary to succeed.
That
is what the president was saying. It just so happens that it has been the
nations of Europe historically, countries traditionally populated by Caucasians
and civilized by them and by the historic Christian faith that gave birth to
the American nation and to our basic institutions. That is not to say that
other countries could not have provided a basis…indeed, although President
Trump did not use them as examples, he could have very well made a comparison
between, say, Japan or the Republic of China-Taiwan. He could have said, for
example:
“Why
do we always favor immigration from ‘s---hole’
countries....Why can’t we have
more immigrants from countries like, say, Taiwan or Japan?”
Would
that have made a difference? Probably
not that much, for the main contention here from the SJWs and the
ostentatiously politically correct politicians revolves around that first group of nations, which are in
Latin America and Africa, and which are mostly inhabited by blacks and mixed
race Latinos. Those are the very ethnic groups that have received in our modern
Marxist-dominated Progressivist culture the special status of “most favored
peoples” (MFP). And against whom, even with complete and total justification,
any invidious comparison, any criticism, even with a huge body of statistics
and data to back it up, is ipso facto
“racism.”
Thus,
the essential truth of Donald Trump’s privately expressed statement is passed
over. His use of the locker-room expletive, when all the harrumph and false and
hypocritical shock dissolves as those media and political personalities return
home to catch the latest episode of filth-drenched primetime shows and movies,
also recedes into the background.
The
issue—the only real issue here for
our dominant cultural Marxists and infected politicians—is racism and “white
oppression” (one of two major societal narratives, other being “sexism”). That
President Trump spoke the truth, and spoke it with the same kind of language
that practically all the elites, whether in Hollywood or in DC, employ daily
and delight in using (and imposing on our children from the earliest school
grades), that he vented the same beliefs and understanding that millions of us
know to be patently true and right, well, that has them all aghast, from the
huffy Neocons on Fox (“I don’t believe he should have used that word,” “I
believe he should apologize to Haitians,” said Republican Congressman Mia Love),
to the outraged Democrats, demanding redress, that he grovel and ask for forgiveness
for his grievous sin…of racism.
Representative
Love, it wasn’t your overly expanded idea of racism that governed the president’s
frustrated remark; it was the simple and undeniable fact countries like Haiti
are dysfunctional, failed states, that countries like Mexico and Guatemala are
crime-ridden and wracked by poverty, that immigrants from those countries are uniformly
uneducated, unskilled and unassimilable, that public order and respect for the
rule of law—such as it is—is notably
lacking in those countries, and that the kinds of traditions, culture and
beliefs that helped create the United States are not generally present in those
populations.
No;
I would not use that locker-room word at a church meeting, nor with my nephews.
And, yes, I wish the president had not used it (especially with such “culture
traitors” as Graham and Flake lurking in the same room). But back in November of
2016 American voters elected a street-fighter, perhaps the only kind of fighter
who could make a dent in the putrid and fetid political (and cultural) swamp
that is defiling and destroying what is left of this historic nation.
Perhaps
we figured out, after we had tried all the polite, pass-the-tea-and-donuts
candidates (who had only enabled the rot), that to fight back it would take
such a man who knew all about those dominant players who seek to control our
lives and snuff out our history and pervert our traditions. After all he had
lived in their midst for decades—and he knew how to combat them: go for the
jugular, hit them hard in the gut where it hurts, and don’t apologize!
No comments:
Post a Comment