March 22, 2018
MY CORNER by Boyd Cathey
Billy Graham
and the End of the Dream of American Unity
The Reverend Billy Graham
passed away a month ago, on February 21, and like many Americans I watched much
of the televised funeral ceremonies when they were held for him in Charlotte.
Although I come from a different branch of Christianity where Gregorian chant
and a millennia-old liturgy form the major mode of religious communication and
the expression of prayer, I was impressed by the transparency and simplicity of
the Graham service. Here, truly, was a man of God, motivated by the sincere
desire to see the Message of the Gospel spread to every corner of the world.
But there seemed to be a deeper
symbolism manifested in the funeral service for this towering historical and
religious figure. For seventy years Billy Graham represented in all the best
ways a certain unity of Americans and of America. Although assuredly a
conservative in his Evangelical theology, and, therefore, arguably a
conservative when it came to eventual and inevitable political implications and
manifestations that his beliefs would have, he maintained throughout his life a
strict (or as strict as possible) non-partisanship that stretched across the
American political spectrum, just as it did across the racial spectrum. Thus,
he counseled both Republican and Democrat presidents, from Richard Nixon to
Jimmy Carter to George W. Bush to Bill Clinton.
And his evangelism was not
sectarian. Although nominally a Southern Baptist, Graham never pushed one
denomination over another; his emphasis was strictly to reach unbelievers or
those weak in belief, and to encourage them, give them support for their own
acceptance of the grace of Our Savior.
On that first Friday in March,
then, there in Charlotte both the powerful and the less powerful gathered to
honor a man who symbolized what America and most Americans once aspired to. And in that sense, his passing is extremely
significant.
For just as the Reverend Billy
Graham epitomized an historic American unity, a unity that enabled Americans to
speak more or less the same language and posit common goals, even if they
disagreed on how to define those goals or how to present specific issues, his
passing symbolizes the final, bitter end of that unity.
That crashing, noisy decline
and fractious dissolution of American unity had been in the making for years,
for decades. It was clearly evident for those who were perceptive observers
back in the 1960s; but it pre-dates that turbulent decade. Indeed, its roots go
much further back in our history. Premonitions and hints of its consequences on
different levels may be traced to the violent end of the older American
constitutionalism on the battlefield with the defeat of the Southern
Confederacy in 1865—and to the triumph of the various “suffrage movements” and
Progressivist reform initiatives—and to the advent of the globalist “managerial
state” (to use the terminology of writers James Burnham and Sam Francis)—and to
the historic triumph of cultural Marxism (and worse) in our schools and
colleges and in our entertainment industry—and finally, to the very perversion
of the language and forms of communication we employ to express our thinking
and exchange ideas with fellow citizens.
Since the end of World War II
and more particularly since the 1960s an emerging “counter-reality” has
increasingly asserted its position of dominance in our culture. That
counter-reality is a “rough beast” (to use Irish poet William Butler Yeats’
chiliastic language), an incubus born in the fevered philosophy of early 20th century
Marxist theoreticians like Antonio Gramsci, whose designs involved a “long
march” through Western Christian institutions, that is, through Western
culture. Understanding the failure of “war Communism” to defeat the Christian
West immediately after the conclusion of World War I, Gramsci and his epigones
postulated a program of multilevel, gradual subversion over decades.
As Robert Royal has described
this process:
They didn’t just seek to sway
leaders, in Church or state. Those gains could easily disappear if different
leaders came to power. No, said Gramsci, their genius was to create una cultura capillare, a fine network of institutions and opinion that, like the
capillaries in our bodies, reach every nook and cranny. Wonder why religious
liberty or marriage hangs by a single vote in the Supreme Court? The
counterculture has burrowed away in education, law schools, media, and culture.
[“1968 at 50,” The Catholic Thing, February 12, 2018, https://www.thecatholicthing.org/2018/02/12/1968-at-50/ ]
And in this project they have
been singularly successful. They have, indeed, created a kind of
“counter-reality,” replete with its own standards of what is “good” and what is
“evil.” From its incredibly significant pupils among the Frankfort School
intellectuals (leftist Jewish academics who left Germany and took refuge in New
York in the 1930s), what we term cultural Marxism soon exercised critical
influence and eventual control in how the “establishment” viewed major issues
of race and gender. Through what is termed Critical Race Theory, it imposed a
new and dogmatic template on studies of race and racial relations, positing the
existence of historic “white racist oppression” (which must be defeated and destroyed,
and also compensated for) and the imposition of a rigid and increasingly severe
political correctness.
In the newly-established realm
of “gender studies,” it openly denied and attempted to proscribe the historic
and natural roles of men and women, replacing them with a so-called “sexual
equality,” which in fact entails the destruction of historic masculinity and
the politicization of sexual functionality.
In this revolutionary
Progressivist project, the cultural Marxists have over the years moved to
secure the major guard posts of and in our culture—in the media, in academia,
in Hollywood, and in the political and managerial government establishment. The
supposed election of Hillary Clinton in 2016 would have cemented their de facto
control and extended its domination—a kind of mopping up operation—for eight
additional years, time to facilitate a complete change-out of the American
judiciary and strengthen their stranglehold on nearly every segment of American
society.
In this they had the good fortune
to be opposed by a thoroughly nugatory “opposition,” a Republican Party and
self-satisfied “conservative movement,” that actually did more to enable and
canonize Leftist advances and gains than thwart them. There are endless
examples of this “conservative” collaborationism; one only need examine the
feckless collapse of establishment “conservatism” in the face of the same sex
lobby, and the “defense of same sex marriage” as “conservative” by the likes of
Jonah Goldberg and George Will, who despite their views continue to enjoy the
reputation as respected conservatives among the movement’s elite. Indeed, on
the death of Graham the supercilious Will, an intransigent Never Trumper
defender of the Establishment “Swamp,” authored a snarky and condescending column
on the evangelist, calling him “vain” and “naïve,” even “anti-semitic.” His
column appeared in the equally condescending National Review. [“Billy Graham: Neither Prophet nor Theologian,” February 21,
2018, https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/02/billy-graham-legacy-neither-prophet-nor-theologian/] What, if anything, distinguishes Will’s ravings from those of
his buddies on the Far Left?
The totally unexpected election
of Donald Trump in November 2016 upset the apple cart—the time table—of the
Deep State managers and their cultural Marxist circulatory system that feeds
the Progressivist revolution. Indeed, the one now clearly palpable error of the
historic cultural Marxist long-march has been that in their calculated invasion
and subversion of our society’s major cultural and political institutions, they
had, in many respects, left behind and neglected millions of “normal” citizens,
the “deplorables” (those Obama called “bitter clingers”).
The strategic theory was that
by capturing the major institutions, in particular academia and entertainment,
and by dominating and utilizing the Mainstream Media, the Progressivist
revolution could easily survive a few minor electoral defeats at the hands of
milquetoast, “flee-to-the-tall-grass” spineless Republicans and
collaborationist “conservatives,” who, after all, would not actually challenge
the template or attempt to alter the Progressivist narrative. And that
eventually, with the powerful means of communication secure in the hands of the
Left working full time to spread their ideological poison—and with the very
language we all use to communicate radically altered and shaped to reflect that
narrative—those reactionary citizens would, eventually, follow along (or at
least their brainwashed children would).
Well beyond just the practical
and political effects of the election of Donald Trump in policy and politics,
November 2016 brought out into the open the demonic face of the Deep State and
cultural Marxism. Once content to quietly continue their seemingly unstoppable
and multifaceted advance, with no real effective opposition to their designs,
the 2016 election tore away the mask, forced the minions of globalism and the
New World Order to emerge from their dark and secure offices in Manhattan, in
Hollywood, and along the Potomac—and from their safe sinecures in America’s
most prestigious universities—to mount a frenzied and at times hysterical
counter-attack to recover their momentum and repair the breach that appeared to
threaten their power and authority.
Thus, the fake “Russians Did
It!” investigation—thus what can only be termed a real and unquenchable
madness, a lunacy on the part of the partisans of the Deep State which is fatal
to the American republic, itself.
The passing of Billy Graham as
symbol of an older America—and arguably a much better America—is, then, in a
very sobering and agonizing way, the symbol of an irrevocably divided America.
It is a broken America in which a once more or less somnolent and trusting
citizenry, that is, Sam Francis’ Middle American Radicals—the
Deplorables—mostly living in the South and in the great areas of the country
between the Atlantic and Pacific coasts (“fly-over” country), have begun to
awaken and have begun to comprehend, if only obliquely, what has been
happening.
And the Deep State and its
cultural Marxist commissars in our schools and universities, among the
Hollywood and entertainment elites, and populating and dominating our politics
in both political parties, will not relent in their attacks until the true
opposition to their schemes is either forced back into the genie’s lamp, or
they (or we) are slaughtered on the bloody battlefield.
The symbol of Billy Graham, the
ability of Americans of all stripes to talk with one another—indeed, to get
along with and pray with one another—was a noble dream. But as reality, it has
been under attack almost since the country’s inception. The moving and quiet
tribute to Graham was, in fact, a tribute and final interment of that dream
which now appears an impossibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment