June 8, 2018
MY CORNER by Boyd
Cathey
Gender Destruction:
The Other Major Weapon
of Cultural Marxism
Friends,
Three
days ago, on June 5, I remitted comments to you on the topic titled “Racism,
the Marxist Weapon to Transform the West.” [see: http://boydcatheyreviewofbooks.blogspot.com/2018/06/june-4-2018-my-corner-by-boyd-cathey.html]
In my commentary I alluded to two major avenues of attack by what is termed
cultural Marxism, and although I posited that race (and the use of the meme of
racism and various types of white oppression, supremacy and privilege that must
be overturned) is the major template in this multifaceted and massive assault
on traditional Western and Christian civilization, the use and manipulation of gender
is certainly not far behind.
Just a cursory review of the news, at any time
of day, on any network, in any newspaper or format, confirms this abundantly.
Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby, and Dr. Larry Nasser (former physician with the
USA Gymnastics team) have been just three of the more notorious villains. But
their probable guilt and credibility as witnesses for the prosecution in highly
visible and publicized sex abuse cases occlude something far more sinister and
far more comprehensive occurring in our society, and that is an attack on the
very idea of separate and distinguishable genders, on gender identity, a
concerted attempt to undo and defy what nature and nature’s God have decreed.
A
similar modus operandi—a similar “M.O.” to that used by social justice warriors
in their efforts to root out so-called racism and white privilege—is
employed by educators in both grammar
schools and in colleges, by Hollywood and the sports industry, and increasingly
by politicians, to radically transform our traditional beliefs and conceptions
of sexual identity and roles. In short, to overturn nature, itself.
There
are countless examples of this, ranging from very local moves by nearby schools
on all levels to engineer a curriculum that, practically-speaking, dissolves
“maleness” while touting “inclusiveness,” which almost always means inculcating
the normalization of LGBT preferences and encouraging feminism and “womens’
liberation,” to broader efforts via the entertainment media and sports industry
to deny God-created differences in every way imaginable.
Hapless
and beset upon parents, most of whom must work forty hour weeks and tend to
running a household, are too often rendered defenseless, incapable of resisting
the latest measures of Big Brother—whether that Big Brother be the latest
diktat emanating from junior’s school district, or whether it come in
browbeating from their pastor, or increasingly less subtle indoctrination from
popular culture, television, movies, and social interaction over the Internet.
Like
the racism tsunami, the gender revolutionaries seem unstoppable and invincible;
and beleaguered parents, especially those who cannot afford to send their
children to private or religious schools, often find themselves outflanked,
out-maneuvered, and intellectually incapable of successful resistance.
In
recent years, there have been efforts—as yet baby steps—to undo some of the
worst damage inflicted by the gender revolutionaries, especially in education,
including most notably, provisions for school choice and charter schools. But
this counter-revolution is only a small measure in what must become a total
dismantling of our educational establishment, from grammar school to college—if
any lasting success be obtained, and if we somehow rescue our inherited
civilization from the revolutionary vandals who seek its destruction.
Those
measures must include the eventual and carefully-thought-out privatization of
our school system, and the radical reform of college education.
But,
additionally, it must encompass a vision of recovering or at least establishing
a significant presence in our entertainment, our sports, and in our broader
culture. For reforming the schools without that, only leaves students subject
to the same infectious influences they were receiving in school, but this time, outside
it.
Today
I pass on four short items, and I think there is thematic linkage between them.
The first details the efforts to establish a “third gender” on birth
certificates for New Yorkers; you must read this to believe it. Second, there
is the story that Boy Scouts—oops! Pardon me, “Scouts of America”—will now
provide condoms to all scouts and their scout leaders at the global scout meeting
in West Virginia, July 21-August 1, 2018. Yep, you heard that right, also. [I
am not even going to speculate on that one.] Third, I pass on a news report
concerning a local bill enacted by the North Carolina General Assembly allowing
towns around Charlotte to set up their own charter schools, not governed by the
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools “Welcoming Schools” diversity program which seeks
to mainstream transgenderism and same sex activity.
Finally—and
some of you may find this too controversial—I send on an essay by a friend of
mine, Professor Jesse Russell, who like me contributes to the right wing
traditionalist Catholic journal, The
Remnant. Dr. Russell writes on rock-and-roll as a kind of Trojan Horse that
has had definite and long-range effects on the nation’s morality and, even
more, on our youth, our general conception of ourselves…and our relation with
our Maker.
===================================================================
A 3rd Gender on Birth Certificates? NYC May Allow It
Michael Foust | ChristianHeadlines.com Contributor |
Wednesday, June 6, 2018
A new proposal supported by the mayor and city
council speaker would allow people who were born in New York City to select a
third gender known as “X” on their birth certificate.
“This groundbreaking legislation will make New York
City birth certificates more inclusive for all and will send a powerful signal
to the world that New York City government works for everyone,” City Council
Speaker Corey Johnson said during a press conference, according to the New
York Post.
A hearing on the proposal is set for July, with a
vote in September, the newspaper reported. Johnson called the third gender a
“non-binary” choice.
Three states -- California, Washington and Oregon –
also allow people to choose a third gender on their birth certificates.
Already, parents of newborns who don’t want a
gender on their child’s birth certificate can place asterisks in the gender
category until the child is old enough to choose a gender.
Newborns whose parents don’t want to enter a gender
would continue under the current system of being documented with four asterisks
as a placeholder until their kids are old enough to choose for themselves.
Condoms now REQUIRED to be made available at Boy Scouts gathering
Development is astoundingly clear sign that the Christian basis of the US-based Boy Scouts of America has been vanquished by secular liberalism
http://theduran.com/condoms-now-required-availble-at-boy-scouts-gathering/?mc_cid=2ead9cf246&mc_eid=42e11870e2
World Net Daily reported
that a new mandate to be put in effect this June
takes scouting to a new level entirely. For the first time, condoms will
be required to be available to all participants at
its global gathering to be held in West Virginia between July 21 and August 1,
2018. This mandate has been quoted
by many news agencies as directing the host
organizations, such as Boy Scouts of America (now Scouts BSA) to:
… ensure that condoms are
readily and easily accessible for all participants and IST [staff] at a number
of locations on the site. Heads of Contingent must be informed in advance and
made aware of their responsibility in communicating this policy to their
Participants, Unit Leaders, Contingent Staff, and IST in an appropriate way.”
(See Guideline 7.3 on page 10 of the document.)
The Scouts own announcement reads as
follows:
For the first time, a world
jamboree will be hosted by three national Scout organizations: Scouts Canada,
Asociación de Scouts de México, and the Boy Scouts of America. These three
distinct cultures will join together to host the world Scouting community in a
celebration of cultural exchange, mutual understanding, peace, and friendship.”
Only now, that friendship seems to
include something like friends with benefits, because now condoms are required.
This is rather a first for an organization whose age range in America is
limited to the range between 6 to 18 at the most. While World Scouts has a
higher top-end age of 26 (legal adulthood, which at least legally justifies this condom rule), the reported problem is
that this availability is to be extended to kids who are not of legal age of
consent in the United States. In West Virginia, this age is 16.
The American scouting associations were
historically well-connected to Christian ethics and values. This showed in the oath a new Scout took:
On my honor, I will do my
best
To do my duty to God and my country and to obey the Scout Law;
To help other people at all times;
To keep myself physically strong, mentally awake and morally straight.
To do my duty to God and my country and to obey the Scout Law;
To help other people at all times;
To keep myself physically strong, mentally awake and morally straight.
Note that the Boy Scout Oath
has traditionally been considered to have three promises. Those three promises
are delineated by the semicolons in the Oath, which divide it into three
clauses. The three promises of the Scout Oath are, therefore:
- Duty to God and country,
- Duty to other people, and
- Duty to self
DUTY TO GOD AND COUNTRY: Your family and religious leaders
teach you to know and serve God. By following these teachings, you do your duty
to God.
Men and women of the past
worked to make America great, and many gave their lives for their country. By
being a good family member and a good citizen, by working for your country’s
good and obeying its laws, you do your duty to your country. Obeying the Scout
Law means living by its 12 points:
- Trustworthy,
- Loyal,
- Helpful,
- Friendly,
- Courteous,
- Kind,
- Obedient,
- Cheerful,
- Thrifty,
- Brave,
- Clean,
- and Reverent.
DUTY TO OTHER PEOPLE: Many people need help. A cheery smile and a
helping hand make life easier for others. By doing a Good Turn daily and
helping when you’re needed, you prove yourself a Scout and do your part to make
this a better world.
DUTY TO SELF: Keeping
yourself physically strong means taking care of your body. Eat the right foods and
build your strength. Staying mentally awake means learn all you can, be curious,
and ask questions. Being morally straight means to live your life with honesty, to be clean in your
speech and actions, and to be a person of strong character.
What do condoms have to do with a [supposedly]
Christianity-based association such as Boy Scouts of America? The Boy Scouts of
America has been under a particularly strong
attack for years, and it had appeared to reach a
culmination this year when the decision was made to allow girls to participate
in the once all-male organization.
That was after homosexuals
were allowed in 2015 to serve as scout leaders and counselors and after repeated attempts to uphold the Boy Scout
traditional code of values (which was given a solid approval by no less than
the US Supreme Court), were met with withdrawal of support from corporate
donors, such as Lockheed-Martin, the defense contractor; Disney, whose attacks
on this moral code have been withering and constant; Merck, Intel, UPS and many
United Way chapters have also joined in the condemnation of the upholding of
traditional values by the scouting association.
Much of this was at its greatest intensity between the years
2012 and 2014 according to the datelines of the stories covering the matter.
But in 2018 the wall was finally breached, and now girls may join the
association. In fact, Boy Scouts of America is in fact no more, with a new name
and brand, Scouts BSA, expected to go into force in 2019.
This most recent change, having taken effect in late April
of this year, caused no small stir among parents who used to be Scouts in their
own youth. The destruction of this Christianity-based organization and its
history of being attacked and broken down by liberal radicalism was brought to
a seeming culmination with the allowing of girls into the organization.
However, some very interesting commentary could be seen in
social media regarding this matter. One parent noted that Girl Scouts had
become even more compromised, essentially offering only an
indoctrination into feminism and useless, boring and dull activities for girls,
which were said to be nowhere near the caliber of the activities the Boy Scouts
were still doing.
Viewed in that light, it seemed a lot less tragic, because
it was merely seen as a move from a severely compromised association to a much
less compromised one. After all Boy Scouts was still functioning at a pretty
high level, so why not let girls in and simply make it a single organization?
Which is apparently what happened.
However the slippery slope of liberal and secular humanist
values was able to take another step with this World Scouting Jamboree edict
about condoms. While Scouts BSA (ex-Boy Scouts of America) itself did not
appear to have any interest or investment in doing such a thing, their
participation in a worldwide get-together now places a new anti-Christian
demand on the association.
This could well be seen as a real danger to the kids
themselves. American scouts max out at age 18. Who is going to be using these
condoms, and with whom?
This is certainly an affront to the traditional viewpoint
held by the American association, and it is being forced away from that yet
again by liberal activism.
Parents are certainly within their
rights to be worried about this.
General Assembly passes controversial NC charter school bill
PRELIMINARY NOTE:
Thanks to Representative Bill Brawley,
parents in Matthews, Mint Hill, Huntersville, and Cornelius may soon have a
choice about where their children attend school. Charlotte-Mecklenburg
School District’s refusal to listen to parents on issues like “Welcoming
Schools” and the Board's new Multiculturalism Policy are but a few of the
reasons the bill passed both houses of the General Assembly. CMS adopted “Welcoming
Schools” under the guise of bullying prevention, but it is actually focused on
mainstreaming homosexual and transgender behaviors, causing children as young
as Kindergarten to question their own gender and accept these behaviors in
their peers as normal. The Board’s new Multiculturalism Policy added
“sexual orientation and gender identity” as cultures to be studied by students
across all subject areas. If the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School District
refuses to listen to parents and keeps advancing an agenda, we can expect more
of this in the future. The following article illustrates the arguments made by
opponents of the bill and repeated in the Charlotte:
"The General Assembly has approved
a measure to allow four Charlotte-area cities to open their own charter
schools, essentially leaving the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools. Critics have
argued in the past that HB 514 may bring segregation back to our local schools.
Passage of what was called HB 514 means Matthews, Mint Hill, Huntersville and
Cornelius will be able to open their own charter schools. Critics say the four
communities are all wealthy and predominantly white and will be able to give
preference to their own residents for seats in those new classrooms."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NC General
Assembly has approved a measure to allow four Charlotte-area cities to open
their own charter schools, essentially leaving CMS.
Author: Rad
Berky June 6,
2018
CHARLOTTE, N.C. – The General Assembly has approved a measure to
allow four Charlotte-area cities to open their own charter schools, essentially
leaving the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools (CMS). Critics have argued in the past
that HB 514 may bring segregation back to our local schools.
Passage of what was called HB 514 means Matthews, Mint Hill,
Huntersville and Cornelius will be able to open their own charter schools.
Critics say the four communities are all wealthy and predominantly
white and will be able to give preference to their own residents for seats in
those new classrooms. In a statement that came just minutes after the final
vote of approval from the House, CMS said it was weighing possible responses,
an indication that a lawsuit could follow.
The statement went on to say, “Our community and state must always
try to do what is best for our children and we owe it to future generations to
stay focused on their needs.”
Tuesday, a group of former CMS board members met with local
members of the clergy to say they were concerned about what would happen if HB
514 passed. “In a time when we have increased diversity in our community, we
should not isolate our schools along racial and socioeconomic lines," said
former board member Wilhelmenia Rembert.
Former CMS board chair Arthur Griffon was raised in segregated
schools and feared HB 514 would open a door to a return to segregation in
Charlotte. He said, “Jim Crow was everywhere. You couldn’t go here, you
couldn’t go there because of your color, your status.” He vows the fight over
514 is not over, saying, “I plan to take this as far as I can. In the streets,
as well as in the courts.”
Supporters of the bill argued that race
played no part in it, saying the measure would allow for more choices for
students in those communities.
Thursday, May 24, 2018
Bigger than Jesus? How Rock and Roll and the Beatles Supplanted Christianity and Destroyed the West
Written by Jesse Russell, Ph.D. | Remnant Columnist
“And if a house be divided against
itself, that house cannot stand.” - Mark 3:25
Over at First Things, one of the last redoubts
of the Catholic brand of Neoconservativism, John Waters has a curious
article, “How U2 betrayed Rock and Roll,” arguing that the Irish quartet of aging rockers’ recent
support of the “yes” vote in the Irish referendum on abortion is the
unfortunate culmination of the band’s spiritual and musical degeneration
throughout the 90s and 2000s.
However, Waters’ critique is followed by an odd affirmation that
the Dubliner rockers, who had identified with Christianity off and on in their
careers, were once a “sincere and thoughtful group,” concerned with the noble
task of “truth-telling.”
In fact, Waters even argues further that rock and roll is at least
rooted in the authentic, nay even Christian spirituality of the singing of
black slaves in the antebellum American South—although Waters does admit that
the “relationship between Christ and rock ’n’ roll is paradoxical at best.”
While Waters is correct in his praise of the aesthetic quality of
U2’s music, he errs in his assessment of rock and roll’s allegedly noble roots.
Despite obvious precedence in Gospel-infused songs sung by slaves
as well as in European ballads possibly dating back to the Paleolithic period,
rock and roll has always been evil. At risk of reviving the “Satanic Panic” of
the 1980s, it must be noted that there is no more relation between Christ and
rock and roll than there is between Christ and Satan.
Since its first conjuring by bluesman Robert Johnson who claimed
to have received his musical abilities from the devil himself at the crossroads
near Clarksdale, Mississippi, the lyrics, rhythm and harmony, and iconography
of rock and roll has drawn from the murky, Stygian world of the occult.
The greatest rock musicians, from early acts like Elvis and the
Rolling Stones and 70s psychedelic and hard rock giants like the Doors and Led
Zeppelin to more recent artists like Pearl Jam, and, of course U2--not to
mention Luciferan hip hop artists like Jay-Z--have been overtly and proudly
Satanic.
The immediate reaction to these statements from guilty-as-charged
Christian fans of these musical groups is one of disbelief, dismissal, and
(perhaps even spastic) anger. The actual practice of Crowleyan Satanism, the
chanting of spells in songs, and mimicking of the rhythm of pagan ritual in
music is pooh-poohed as merely the eccentric and odd behavior characteristic of
rock and roll, and Christian fans of pop and rock usually dismiss the ability
for this satanic influence to affect devoted and mature fans like themselves.
Despite the resistance such an analysis might trigger, to
understand the essentially diabolical nature of rock and roll, we must focus on
the rock and roll band par excellence, the group that on February 9, 1964, just
three months after the assassination of the first Catholic president in United
States history, appeared on the Ed Sullivan show to choreographed screaming of
the newly invented American teenager, the Beatles.
Landing upon American shores in the wake of the budding trauma of
the Vietnam War, the Beatles showed up just in time for the Kulchurkampf against
the old Christian order. As has oft been remarked by Beatles fans themselves,
the quartet from Liverpool changed everything from American hairstyles and
clothing apparel to religious and sexual norms--lapsed Catholic Sinead O’Connor
even once referred to the Fab Four as the “Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse”
because of the radical cultural sea-change they affected in the Western world.
Humming the songs of the Beatles, no longer would the youth follow the
traditions of their ancestors; the newly minted teenager excited on free love
and LSD would lead the way in culture creation.
The Beatles were, in fact, outspoken in their desire to be rid of
Christianity.
John Lennon famously stated in a London Evening
Standard interview published in March of 1966, “Christianity
will go. It will vanish and shrink. I needn't argue about that; I know I'm
right and I will be proved right. We're more popular than Jesus now. I don't
know which will go first – rock & roll or Christianity.” While Lennon’s
words prompted fierce backlash from Christians around the world, his words
proved to be prophetic, as the rock and roll culture spawned by the Beatles
that packaged together sexual license, rebellion, and psychedelic tinged
occultism became not merely the vanguard of “progress,” but the modus operandi
of the everyday lives of people the world over. As a visibly nervous Lennon in
a televised interview matter-of-factly defended his statement by noting that
the Beatles were having “more influence on kids and things than anyone else,
including Jesus.”
Since Vatican Council II’s “auto-demolition of the faith” was well
under way and Protestantism was itself dissolving as a cultural force in the
West, there was no longer a strong enough cultural resistance in the West to
this new pagan assault.
As if a potent and seductive reply to their Christian critics, in
1967, the Beatles released Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band,
a veritable circus of sex, drugs, and occultism.
Taking aim at the “stiff upper lip,” post-war Britain and the
remnants of Eisenhower’s America, the album contained such anti-Christian songs
as “All the Lonely People,” deriding the pious Eleanor Rigby and the Catholic
priest, Fr. Mckenzie. The implication was that Christianity was boring, but the
hip new Hinduism peddled in songs like “Within You Without You” would provide
an authentic, guilt-free and loving faith to supplement the ancient Christian
faith of the West.
While the Beatles battled back against Christian resistance with
promises of free love, progress, and psychedelic drugs in their music, Sgt.
Pepper’s album cover has been the subject
of intense speculation among Beatle fans as well as conspiracy-minded Christian
critics. Some have argued that the seeming hodge-podge of characters on the
album cover consists of alleged “fans” (both living and dead) of the Beatles.
However, interviews with those involved with the album’s creation reveal that
these figures were, for the most part, chosen personally by the Beatles and
represent influences on the band.
It is curious to note that virtually every figure on the album
cover is either a pioneer of the unholy trinity of sex drugs and rock and roll
and/or was heavily involved in the occult.
The album includes a number of “Venus” characters who helped
further the sexual revolution in the early and mid-twentieth century. In
addition to the degenerate actress Diana Dors, there is, of course, the tragic
Marilyn Monroe as well as Mae West, the first major Hollywood icon of impurity,
who was, among other things, heavily involved in séances, a participant in the
first on screen lesbian kiss, and a star of an early film, Drag,
in which cross-dressing men were featured. As an added bonus, there is Shirley
Temple, one of Hollywood’s first attempts at the sexualization of children.
Very interestingly for a radical band, there also are a number of
architects of modern totalitarianism who combined the use of technology, drug
use, and eugenics for their vision of a New World Order such as Karl Marx,
George Bernard Shaw, H.G. Wells, and Aldous Huxley.
And then there are the three “wild card” figures of the Sgt.
Pepper’s cover. The first is Aleister Crowley, the founder of
modern Satanism personally chosen by John Lennon to be the album cover. In
fact, when asked to summarize the message or spirit of the Beatles, Lennon
would later quote Aleister Crowley’s maxim, “Do What Thou Wilt.”
There are two figures who, very interestingly, did not make it on
the cover of Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band:
Adolf Hitler and Jesus Christ. Both figures were chosen by Beatles’ front man,
John Lennon, but Christ was not included as it would be considered too
irreverent, and Hitler was scrapped for obvious reasons.
The absence of Christ is interesting, for there are many quotes
from Lennon blaspheming Christ and mocking Christianity. However, in the New
Age movement of which the Beatles were devotees, a dethroned Christ as rabbi
and guru is endorsed.
As Adolf Hitler was a rabid occultist and advocate of eugenics and
the New Age version of Nietzsche’s ubermensch or the god-like man above men, it
is no surprise that Lennon would have tried to place the cruel Austrian painter
turned dictator on the cover of one of the most influential rock albums of all
time.
Sgt. Pepper’s was released only one year before
the “Summer of Love,” which initiated the Aquarian Age of sex, drugs, and rock
and roll as well as the ‘68 student revolutions that accelerated the process of
colonizing the Western university for the cause of cultural Marxism.
The psychedelic drug peddling, occult infused, and Christ-mocking
message of Sgt. Pepper’s was thus enough not
simply to push back against Christianity, but to initiate an eruption of
Eastern Mysticism and poisonous New Age spirituality into the West.
As part of their efforts to midwife Hinduism and Tibetan Buddhism
to the West, the Beatles even made a pilgrimage East, not to the Holy Cities of
Rome or Jerusalem as their English ancestors might have, but to Rishikesh,
India, in February of 1968 to study under the famous Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, who
is credited with bringing transcendental meditation to the West.
If, dear reader, transcendental meditation or “T.M.” rings a bell,
it should because Katy Perry, apparently an acquaintance of “good” [sic!] Pope
Francis, recently taught transcendental meditation to
attendees at the Vatican sponsored “Unite to Cure” conference.
Charged with a mission of bringing a new spiritual teaching to the
world via rock and roll, the Beatles took a journey to the East, but as many
have noted, the Beatles, in fact, brought the West with them on their journey,
and helped to inaugurate the New Age movement, which has become the religion of
choice for so many former Christians.
Perhaps the most emblematic song of this deliberate replacement of
Christianity by Hinduism and the New Age was recorded by “the Quiet Beatle,”
George Harrison. Harrison’s 1970 hit “My Sweet Lord” begins as seeming prayer
to Christ and a longing to “see” him but quickly turns into prayers to Hindu gods.
Fully aware of his attempts at initiating the youth of the West into Eastern
mysticism, Harrison specifically stated that it was his goal to get children to
think they were praising Christ at first and then transition them to praying to
Hare Krishna:
“My ideas in ‘My Sweet Lord,’ because it sounded like a ‘pop
song,’ was to sneak up on them a bit. The point was to have the people not
offended by ‘Halleluja,’ and by the time it gets to ‘Hare Krishna,’ they’re
already hooked, and their foot’s taping and they’re already singing along
‘Hallelujah,’ to kind of lull them into this sense of false security. And then
suddenly it turns into ‘Hare Krishna,’ and they will all be singing that before
they know what’s happened, and they think, ‘Hey, I thought I wasn’t supposed to
like Hare Krishna!’”
The struggle between rock and roll and Christianity even factored
into the murder of John Lennon in front of the Dakota apartment building in New
York on December 8, 1980. The killer, Mark David Chapman, was a born again Christian
who supposedly was angry about Lennon’s 1966 comment about the Beatles being
“more popular than Jesus.” The apparently deranged Chapman further claimed to
have been triggered by something about John Lennon’s picture on the cover
of Sgt. Pepper’s.
It is further tragically ironically that both Chapman and Lennon
were both tormented by voices and spiritual presences as if they same demons
that inspired rock and roll also infused the 1970s charismatic evangelical
revival, a movement that often manifests itself in more intoxicating and
Dionysian forms than even the most Bacchanalian rock concert.
After Lennon’s death, the remaining Beatles went on to produce
even more bizarre and occult-laden music and collect royalties from their music
while spending their Golden Years dealing with the effects of psychedelic
drugs, debauchery, and devil-worship.
However, the new religion of rock and roll initiated by the
Beatles grew to become the dominant religion of the West, largely pushing
Christianity out of the way.
In the struggle between Christianity and rock and roll, rock and
roll has won—for now. The Beatles are, in fact, “bigger than Jesus” in the
hearts and minds of many people of the world in this year of Our Lord 2018, and
it should be no surprise that the faux Christian band U2, one of the
innumerable spiritual heirs of the Beatles, should lend their support to the
most horrific modern manifestations of Satanic ritual: abortion.
As Christians, we will only be able to overcome the “culture of
death” by rooting out all of its manifestations in our lives—including the
presence of rock and roll music—and replacing the rock roll culture with a
truly Christian “civilization of love.”
============================================================
No comments:
Post a Comment