March 4, 2019
MY CORNER by Boyd Cathey
For the Fear of Being Labeled a Racist – Newest Essay at RECKONIN.com
Friends,
It’s been a little over a week since the last
installment of MY CORNER, and a few correspondents have wondered why the hiatus, what
was going on, as normally these columns appear several times a week —maybe I
had been “taken out” by an ANTIFA mob or gone on to the Elysian Fields? The
reason is that for me this past week was dedicated almost entirely to
preparations for North Carolina’s annual Confederate Flag Day (for which I am
chairman) that was held this past Saturday, at the historic State Capitol in
Raleigh. That event merits an entire installment and commentary of its own, and
that commentary will come, God willing, a bit later this week.
Today, I pass on a slightly edited column from
February 23, which was picked up the by the Reckonin.com Web site, and I submit that
to you.
********************************
For Fear of Being Labeled a Racist
By Boyd D. Cathey - February 24, 2019
In our society each time a vocally radical Leftist group or the
media cry “racism” and demand that our public figures “jump,” those leaders
respond, usually meekly and apologetically, hat-in-hand: “How high?”
Confronted by such accusations almost always they run for the tall
grass (to quote Patrick Buchanan) hoping that endless self-effacing apologies
and some form of reparation will lessen the indelible stain, that nearly
unforgivable sin which screams to the heavens.
No matter if that infraction was “committed” decades ago, maybe an
innocent student prank, or simply being photographed holding a Confederate
Battle Flag, for instance—since our society has “progressed” forward, we now
know that such actions are symbols of deep-seated white supremacy and bigotry
that must be extirpated and punished severely.
In America the charge of racism has become a magical talisman
which, once made, is a virtual death knell for almost any public official or
social figure, perhaps only exceeded in effect by the accusation of
anti-semitism.
It makes little difference whether the charge is true or not. Once stated and picked up by an
eager-to-oblige media, it could end a career, it could forever discredit a
person, and it may effectively end any platform he might have to express his
views to a large audience. In effect, he would become a virtual “non-person,” a
lone voice speaking to small groups of other “non-persons,” and prevented from
reaching any wider audience.
This is especially true of Republicans and the dominant
conservative movement. In too many cases, it is the fearful conservative
establishment that participates in this process: any faint or farfetched hint
of “racism,” present or past, real or imagined, any deviance from the new
Progressivist dogmatism that saturates our society, brings not just attacks
from the Left, but obloquy and quarantine from our frightened conservative
elites.
To protect their right flanks and for fear of being labeled
“racist,” those elites erect speech barriers and will not in any way permit or
enable non-conforming and Old Right conservatives to appear on their networks
or in their journals. The examples abound: National Review, The Daily Caller,
Frontpage Mag, Fox News (with the notable exception of Tucker Carlson)…the list
is endless.
To invite the real Rightwing opposition into their forums would be
an admission that these outlets are not, in fact, genuine, that they usually
jump when the Left demands it, that they prefer their cocktail parties with
their Inside-the-DC-Beltway Leftwing friends or Manhattan boardroom
confidants…and it would only increase the innate fear they have of being
labeled “racist” (or “sexist” or “homophobic,” as the case may be), as well.
Of course, they will be
labeled “racist” no matter what they do or say. And more’s the pity and utter
insanity of it, for in their praxis, in their obeisance to the Leftist template
and their implicit acceptance of its standards for participation and debate,
they facilitate the continued success of this tactic and eventual destruction
of what remains of the old republic.
If they would stand up to the attacks, if they would reject the
narrative and the ongoing template, if they would refuse its definitions and
its accusations forcefully and intelligently, then the field of battle might be different, might be altered a
bit. But that would require courage and a truthful examination of American
history and culture, and in too many cases, a rejection of dearly held—and
false—principles about equality and the American Founding that several decades
ago invaded both the older conservative movement—Neoconservatism—and now
dominate the Republican Party.
Consider
what is going on currently in North Carolina.
The University of North Carolina System Board of Governors has
before it a decision to make concerning a monument erected a century ago to
students who volunteered to fight for the Confederacy in the War Between the
States. Last August 20 a mob of radical Marxist students, faculty, and others (including
votaries of the Hillsborough Progressives Taking Action, ANTIFA NC, Black Lives
Matter, etc.), tore down the monument on the Chapel Hill campus while
university police were ordered by the school’s administration to “stand down.”
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Board of Trustees
then proposed moving the monument to a museum (not yet built) on campus. This
solution did not please either the Marxist mob or those who wished the monument
to be put back on its pedestal.
Indeed, the North Carolina Monuments Protection Law of 2015
requires the monument to be put back in its original place within 90 days. The
very strict legal exceptions to this—major road work, decay of the monument
that would endanger the public—obviously do not apply in this case.
Given pressure from both sides, the Board of Governors for the
entire university system, having direct purview, created a special committee to
come up with an “agreeable solution” for all parties.
In the meantime, the head of the Chapel Hill institution,
Chancellor Carol Folt, ordered the base of the monument removed as well (in the
middle of the night), once again a clear violation of the 2015 law. As a
result, her resignation was requested and accepted on January 31.
But neither the monument nor its base has been put back as the law
requires. Indeed, all eyes now are on the Board of Governors meeting on March
15 when its special committee is supposed to report back with that “agreeable
solution.”
Here then are the questions for the UNC Board of Governors: Will
they also cave to small, noisy and extreme Leftist mobs of students and Marxist
activists who demand the obliteration of symbols memorializing our
veterans and the total transformation of our culture? Will the Board
collaborate in the flagrant violation of state law by the administration
of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill?
Every indication is that they will—that they will once again
direct that the monument and its base (both now in storage) be placed in a
museum. And in so doing they will violate specific clauses in the 2015
Monuments Law that expressly forbid such action.
Almost certainly lawsuits will follow.
But what is fascinating about this situation is that most of the
members of the UNC Board of Governors are Republicans appointed by the
GOP-controlled North Carolina General Assembly. Most of them are big donors to
the party, major business types, for whom having choice front-row seats at UNC
basketball games and attending glitzy alumni events are very important, and who
wish at all costs to “avoid unsightly controversies” which might get them
labeled as racists and adverse publicity in the local leftist media (e.g.
Raleigh News & Observer, WRAL-TV,
etc.). Standing up for the majority of North Carolina citizens and for respect
of and obedience to the laws of the state are apparently far less important.
Like other Establishment Republicans and faux-conservatives, when
the Left demands that they jump, they frantically look for a way out, and
mutter beneath their breath, worriedly, “how high”?
As a white racist myself, I unhesitatingly self-identify that way.
ReplyDelete