December 18, 2019
MY CORNER by Boyd
Cathey
The Historic
Impeachment Vote: The End of the Democratic Charade?
Friends,
Today,
December 19, 2019, the Democratic majority in the House of Representatives will
vote to approve Articles of Impeachment against President Donald Trump and
agree to send them to the U. S. Senate. It will be only the third formal
impeachment of a president in American history—the other two being that of
President Andrew Johnson in the post-war 1860s and of President Bill Clinton in
the late 1990s.
As
everyone knows by now, the Senate will, after the formality of most likely a
brief trial, vote down the two articles, and that will be that.
Or, will
it?
Given
that almost certain outcome, why, then, have the frenzied denizens of the Left
proceeded in this manner, knowing the outcome?
The
answers—there are various—have already been widely given, and the major ones
are: 1) extreme pressure from the hysterical “social justice warrior” foot
soldier base of the Democratic Party which continues to grow in strength and
threaten incumbents who do not toe the line; 2) demands by the powerful
Mainstream Media, whose ranks are now cluttered by zealously indoctrinated
former journalism students whose thinking and outlook were formed in our
universities by their teachers—I should say “polluted” by our post-Marxist academic
oligarchs (AKA professors); and 3) the certain political use of the issue in the
upcoming 2020 election.
Of
course, the overarching rubric for all of this is an unrestrained and
all-consuming hatred for Donald Trump (and his voters), and the concomitant
desire, at all cost and by whatever means, to expel him from 1600 Pennsylvania
Avenue. No measure, no tactic, no weapon is out of bounds, and that includes
what in effect is the virtual destruction of what is left of the American
Constitution, itself.
President
Trump, for all his foibles and U-turns, despite some misfires in foreign
policy, and despite his major mistake of placing in positions of power around
him those—including Republican hacks and those whose loyalty is dubious at
best—who wish him to fail and wish him harm…despite that, he has done an
immense service to the creaky old American republic. He has pulled the mask off
of the “Deep State” administrative and managerial bureaucratic Establishment which
has basically governed this country as its own private fiefdom for decades, with utter
disdain and condescension for the rest of us…for us “deplorables” and
“irredeemables,” to use Hillary Clinton’s oft-quoted language.
In
certain ways, President Trump is not the real target here. His role has been
far more symbolic and emblematic of something going on, something far more
fearful to the elites so accustomed to running this country. It is something
that he may be only vaguely aware of; and it is happening not just in the weary
old United States, but also in Europe, in Brazil, and elsewhere. It is the rise
of a popular reaction—a populist conservatism which rejects both the dominant
establishment Left and the “don’t-rock-the-boat” establishment conservative
movement (and Republican Party). It is, to paraphrase Gilbert & Sullivan,
the rejection of the “tweedle-dee and tweedle-dum” of our politics, and the
realization, perhaps only vaguely, that the historic liberties and traditions,
the historic moral codes of behavior, and the traditional beliefs upon which
our civilization is based have been progressively perverted and decimated by a
century of constant and ongoing revolution from the top, extended into every
aspect of our lives.
Too many
of our fellow citizens believe that all we have to do is tune into Fox News or
vote for the GOP candidate to staunch and halt the Revolution. That is not sufficient; in fact, in some cases
such devotion only abets and enables the forces of Revolution, as too many
newscasters and pundits at Fox and too many Republican politicians are too
deeply invested in the Neoconservative wing of the Deep State. Of course, there
are exceptions, with Tucker Carlson, in some cases, as it were, getting
“outside the box” and speaking truth to power. But even he must mind his “p’s
and q’s.”
Thus,
“the man with the orange hair” has to be stopped, not so much because of who he is, but because of the extreme danger
he symbolizes and means for the
future of what can only be called the increasingly totalitarian globalist
template. And that template is a dystopian nightmare far more demonic than
anything George Orwell (Nineteen
Eighty-Four) or Arthur Koestler (Darkness
At Noon) ever contemplated in their literary works. Or, by Russian film
director Nikita Mikhalkov in his chilling cinematic masterpiece about the
insanity of Stalinism, Burnt by the Sun
(1994).
At base,
then, this is what this charade called an impeachment is all about. It is an
effort not just against Donald Trump, but against any and everyone who voted
for him, against all of those who dissent from the ongoing policies of and
control by the Deep State, all those who have realized or begun to realize that
what we stare in the face is not the corpulent mass of evil flesh that goes by
the name of Jerry Nadler or the beady-eyed evil of an Adam Schiff, but a “rough
beast” (to use William Butler Yeats’ term) of satanic proportions, intent on our
extinction, and the enthronement of a new false god of Baal, what the late Dr.
Sam Francis called the Leviathan—a totalitarian world government, more fierce
than anything envisaged by Stalin or Mao, without liberties, without tradition,
with morality…and without God.
*****
Yesterday,
President Trump sent a fierce, passionate letter regarding impeachment to
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. In some respects it was one of the finest things he’s
ever written (or said). It went beyond his own case, the present political
sham, and touched upon issues which profoundly affect the very foundations of our
republic. In reading it and re-reading it, it is possible to see the real
constitutional and legal issues, the political chicanery, and, yes, the actual
threats to what remains of our liberties vouchsafed to us by the Framers and
assaulted massively in 1861-1865, and diminished even more since then.
I pass on
a link to the PDF file:
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000016f-1562-d580-a96f-3f66e9950000
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=0000016f-1562-d580-a96f-3f66e9950000
No comments:
Post a Comment