March 26, 2020
MY CORNER by Boyd
Cathey
Every Southerner
Should Get Chronicles Magazine
Friends,
On
various occasions I’ve made references to Chronicles
Magazine and cited articles printed in it. Remarkably, Chronicles is the only
print magazine of stature (it is also online) in America which has represented
and aired traditionalist conservative viewpoints, in depth and intelligently,
now for forty-four years.
Edited by
Dr. Paul Gottfried (Raffensperger Professor of Humanities, Emeritus,
Elizabethtown College), the magazine includes some of the finest writers of the Old
or Traditionalist conservative persuasion in the Anglosphere. And recently, Chronicles, which has been consistently favorable
to the heritage and traditions of the South, has published even more quality
essays by and on Southerners. Early this year the magazine inaugurated a series
–“Remembering….”—which undertakes to recover the thinking and wisdom of various
writers, many of them from the South, who contributed mightily to American
history and culture, but who, largely due to the dominance nationally of the
anti-Southern Neoconservatives, have been neglected or exiled from the public
square.
In the
December 2019 issue, for example, Chronicles
featured fascinating appreciations of Mel Bradford (by Clyde Wilson), Robert
Lewis Dabney (by Zachary Garris), and an introductory essay by Gottfried
titled, “Remembering the Right.” Subsequent issues have featured an
appreciation of the late historian Eugene Genovese (by Robert Paquette, a
Genovese amanuensis, in the January 2020 issue) and Tar Heel writer Richard Weaver
(by Jay Langdale, in the February 2020 issue).
Chronicles has never been afraid to
address controversial issues from a traditionalist point of view, and thus go
against the grain of our consumerist and authoritarian gate keepers who now
control the establishment Conservative Movement and who accept far too many
precepts and agenda points of the looney Left. An excellent example of this
intelligent and thoughtful non-conformity—this “emperor-has-no-clothes”
approach to the intellectual bankruptcy of “Conservatism Inc.”—is the February
2020 issue, which not only has the Weaver appreciation but several other
significant contributions that every thinking Southerner would do well to
search out.
A major
contribution is Dr. Brion McClanahan’s superb critique of the latest initiative
of the fanatically “woke” Leftwing historical establishment, “The 1619 Project,”
which attempts to frame all of American history in the terms of race as the
pivotal benchmark in the development of this continent since the first African
slave stepped off the boat. McClanahan’s essay is a masterful response that demolishes
the very basis of “the project.” Another essay by him in the same issue, “The
Reinvention of Reconstruction,” demonstrates how Reconstruction and it policies
were renewed as an ideological platform for both historians and politicians in
the 1960s, and how this ideology has come to dominate all discussion about the War
Between the States, about civil rights (expanding beyond simple laws on accommodation
or voting, to such extremes as same sex marriage and a race-consciousness in
nearly aspect of American life), and the virtual excommunication of anyone who
would question that narrative.
Another
fascinating February contribution, “The Great Debate: Lincoln’s Legacy,” by H.
A. Scott Trask is a thorough examination of the famous and long-running
discussions between Drs. Harry Jaffa and Mel Bradford over the (nefarious) role
of Abraham Lincoln, not just during the 1861-1865 War, but even more
significantly since then on the decay and destruction of American
institutions and the Constitution. Trask goes into some detail regarding the
profound and significant debate between Jaffa, who seized upon the Declaration
of Independence—in particular, its propagandistic exclamation that “all men are
created equal”—to assert that equality was the fundamental basis of the
American nation, and Bradford, who firmly rejected that proposition: America
was based on communities and families who came to these shores for land and
liberty; NOT to establish some egalitarian “world state,” as Jaffa
implied (see for example, Bradford's deeply-reasoned, “The Heresy of Equality,” Modern Age, Winter 1976). Editor
Gottfried adds additional and critical commentary.
As both
Trask and Gottfried show it was Southerner Bradford’s rather complete take-down
and devastating assault of the “Lincoln Myth” that got him into serious trouble
with the Neoconservatives. Supported in 1981 by Senators Jesse Helms and John
East of North Carolina, and Howell Heflin of Alabama, to be President Reagan’s
head of the National Endowment for the Humanities, Bradford was immediately
attacked by columnist George Will and other establishment (Neocon)
conservatives for his writings on Lincoln and the Confederacy. Such views, once
welcomed by the older Conservative movement in the 1950s and 1960s, were now verboten and most likely “racist.” And
after a barrage of negative attacks, the appointment went to Democrat, Neocon-favorite
William Bennett.
For full
disclosure I admit that I have had a few items published by the magazine over
the past couple of years, and a review of my book, The Land We Love: The South and Its Heritage (Scuppernong Press,
2018), by Dr. Donald Livingston of The Abbeville Institute, was published in
the May 2019 issue. Let me add that I have been a subscriber for nearly thirty
of the magazine’s forty -four years, and I look forward to its arrival in my mailbox
each month.
The
annual subscription price for the print edition is $48.00 a year, twelve monthly
issues—well worth the cost (which would be about the same for a husband and wife
at middling steak house).
Chronicles subscriptions and a view
of some of the recent articles are available at its Web site: https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/.
There is also an “800” number for those who prefer the old-fashioned method of
using the telephone. And while you are there on the Web site, take a look at
the Archive of articles and essays, a veritable cornucopia of excellent
traditionalist writing.
Every
Southerner who really cares about our heritage and traditions, who is concerned
about the present parlous state of the American nation, and who is worried
about what kind of country we have become and what we will leave to our
children and grandchildren, should receive Chronicles.
In a sense, it is one of the best
“weapons,” certainly intellectually and historically, we can have in our meager
arsenal. In these dark days, as our monuments come down and, to quote poet
William Butler Yeats, “The best lack all conviction, while the
worst/Are full of passionate intensity,” Chronicles
is a ray of light and a hope for our future.
Dear Mr Cathey, While what you've written here about this magazine is certainly true, you may also want to inform your readers that this magazine published articles by and promoted a homosexual, Justin Raimondo. Mr Raimondo passed away last year and the magazine published an obituary in which it recognized that he had had a "husband". It may be important to let your readers know this so that they can make a more informed decision about whether to support this magazine - whose management is certainly somewhat delusional if it believes a man can have a "husband". Thank you.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the poster. Although Raimondo's writing and his views were substantially correct on almost all points, his "personal life" was objectionable to traditionalists and Christians. However, CHRONICLES is now being edited by Dr. Paul Gottfried, and his views on that topic are sound and orthodox. Thank you for the comment.
ReplyDeleteI recall reading that when Justin Raimondo was an active libertarian he led some sort of "gay liberation" group within those circles (in the 1970s), but at least dating from the time he became involved in the Buchanan campaigns he appears to have kept his views private on those matters (to whatever extent they were different). At one point I recall reading that he had even written against "gay marriage," but I don't recall him having been a campaigner for it. He wrote an excellent article (for Chronicles, I believe) on the Matthew Shepherd killing, an account which ran very much counter to the PC narratives (i.e., the "gay" agenda). I don't recall reading the obituary in question, but if they actually used "husband" then that was unfortunate. I don't know that anyone at Chronicles then or now supported or supports "gay marriage."
ReplyDelete