October 23, 2021
MY CORNER by Boyd Cathey
Putin for President? If Illegals Can Vote in
Biden’s
America, Why Not?
Friends,
I chose that headline specifically as an eye-opener….
As an uncle of mine used to say delightfully
about the late Senator Jesse Helms (R-NC), when the senator said something which
outraged the liberal establishment in Washington DC and in Raleigh NC, “he done
done it again!”
I caught myself saying the same thing—with
the same delight as my late uncle—when I read the hysterical reporting of The
Washington Post and The
Hill on Russian President Vladimir Putin’s latest remarks to the International
Valdai Forum, held in Sochi, on October 21, 2021. Not that Putin had
said anything new, not that his speech in Sochi was much different from
speeches he had given for the past decade in which he harshly criticized the US
and Western Europe for their de facto rejection
of their Christian moral and ethical traditions, and embrace of what Putin
calls “a new secularist paganism.”
But here he was once again, standing his
ground, now on the attack, and this time taking aim squarely at the American
and Western shibboleths regarding the now-fashionable memes of “diversity,
equity, and inclusion,” transgenderism, and “gender fluidity,” all of which he
scornfully rejects. And at the same time staunchly defending the traditional
family, championing distinct male and female roles in society, and affirming
Russia’s historic Christian heritage (while rejecting outright Bolshevism and
the horrible damage it inflicted not just on Russia but the rest of the world).
Reading WaPo and CNN
blurbs you can just see the uncontrollably incensed and livid pundits and
writers at those august organs of the authoritarian managerial administrative
state who have over the years arrogated to themselves the sole right to
determine our destiny and dictate how we live and what we think: “That man in
the Kremlin doesn’t bow down to our globalist secularism!” they repeat. “He
refuses our liberal democracy! He is outside the ‘family of civilized nations.’ He must be stopped…where is John McCain when
we need him?”
Ha! When challenged, the Devil squeals.
How the (neo) pagans—our elites in America
and Western Europe—rage! And how satisfying it is to see ole’ Vlad, along with
Viktor Orban in Hungary, almost alone among the leaders of nations in the world
turning their faces away steadfastly from the fetid, maggot-infected beliefs
which now dominate and generally control us!
Over the years I have been making the point
that both the American “conservative neoconservative” establishment and the
Left share
essentially the same perspective on
post-Communist Russia. They consider its rejection of “liberal
humanist” and “secular democratic” values (including same sex marriage and
transgenderism) to be an unpardonable sin, a violation of lese-majeste’ against the New World Order. Whether such notable
Neoconservative pundits as the late (and unlamented) Charles Krauthammer at Fox
News and the frenetic scribbler Jamie Kirchick, or the entire editorial board
at The New York Times, the Left and what
my friend Dr. Paul Gottfried has called “Con Inc” share the same loathing for
our historic Christian heritage and beliefs.
Yes, the Brian Kilmeades, Ben Shapiros and
Jonah Goldbergs might insist that they are just advancing the values and ideas
of the great 18th century Enlightenment about freedom and equality.
Indeed, that’s the problem, for those ideas have matured into an ideological whirlwind
that threatens twenty centuries of Christian belief and culture.
Let me quote a few lines from Putin’s most
recent defiance of the globalists. See what you think, whether you think he is
a “dangerous Nazi, bigot, and racist” or just maybe a defender of beliefs our
country once held sacred:
“We look in amazement
at the processes underway in the countries which have been
traditionally looked at as the standard-bearers
of progress. Of course, the social and cultural shocks that
are taking place in the United States and Western Europe are
none of our business; we are keeping out of this. Some people
in the West believe that an aggressive elimination
of entire pages from their own history, ‘reverse discrimination’ against
the majority in the interests of a minority,
and the demand to give up the traditional notions
of mother, father, family and even gender, they believe that all
of these are the mileposts on the path towards social
renewal.
“Listen, I would like
to point out once again that they have a right to do this, we
are keeping out of this. But we would like to ask them to keep
out of our business as well. We have a different viewpoint,
at least the overwhelming majority of Russian society – it
would be more correct to put it this way – has a different
opinion on this matter. We believe that we must rely on our own
spiritual values, our historical tradition and the culture
of our multiethnic nation.
“The advocates of so-called
‘social progress’ believe they are introducing humanity to some kind
of a new and better consciousness…. The only thing that
I want to say now is that their prescriptions are not new
at all. It may come as a surprise to some people, but
Russia has been there already. After the 1917 revolution,
the Bolsheviks, relying on the dogmas of Marx
and Engels, also said that they would change existing ways
and customs and not just political and economic ones, but
the very notion of human morality and the foundations
of a healthy society. The destruction of age-old values,
religion and relations between people, up to and including
the total rejection of family (we had that, too), encouragement
to inform on loved ones – all this was proclaimed progress and,
by the way, was widely supported around the world back then
and was quite fashionable, same as today. By the way,
the Bolsheviks were absolutely intolerant of opinions other than
theirs.
“This, I believe, should call
to mind some of what we are witnessing now. Looking at what is
happening in a number of Western countries, we are amazed
to see the domestic practices, which we, fortunately, have left,
I hope, in the distant past. The fight for equality
and against discrimination has turned into aggressive dogmatism bordering
on absurdity, when the works of the great authors
of the past – such as Shakespeare – are no longer
taught at schools or universities, because their ideas are believed
to be backward. The classics are declared backward and ignorant
of the importance of gender or race. In Hollywood
memos are distributed about proper storytelling and how many characters
of what colour or gender should be in a movie. This is even
worse than the agitprop department of the Central Committee
of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
“Countering acts of racism is
a necessary and noble cause, but the new ‘cancel culture’ has
turned it into ‘reverse discrimination’ that is, reverse racism… [….]
“In a number
of Western countries, the debate over men’s and women’s rights
has turned into a perfect phantasmagoria. Look, beware of going where
the Bolsheviks once planned to go – not only communising chickens,
but also communising women. One more step and you will be there.
“Zealots of these new approaches
even go so far as to want to abolish these concepts altogether.
Anyone who dares mention that men and women actually exist, which is
a biological fact, risk being ostracised. ‘Parent number one’ and ‘parent
number two,’ ‘birthing parent’ instead of ‘mother,’ and ‘human milk’
replacing ‘breastmilk’ because it might upset the people who are unsure
about their own gender. I repeat, this is nothing new;
in the 1920s, the so-called Soviet Kulturtraegers also invented
some newspeak believing they were creating a new consciousness
and changing values that way. And, as I have already said, they
made such a mess it still makes one shudder at times.
“Not to mention some truly
monstrous things when children are taught from an early age that
a boy can easily become a girl and vice versa. That is,
the teachers actually impose on them a choice we all supposedly
have. They do so while shutting the parents out of the process
and forcing the child to make decisions that can upend their
entire life. They do not even bother to consult with child
psychologists – is a child at this age even capable
of making a decision of this kind? Calling a spade
a spade, this verges on a crime against humanity, and it is
being done in the name and under the banner
of progress.
“Well, if someone likes this, let
them do it. I have already mentioned that, in shaping our approaches,
we will be guided by a healthy and strong conservatism.”
Can anyone imagine a major American
politician making such comments, much less a president making them?
There is much more that I could
cite, Putin’s eloquent speeches from 2013, 2014, 2017, 2018 and later, all very
consistently making the same points. But not only that, there have been
substantial and concrete legislative pro-family and pro-Christian actions taken
by the Russian Duma (parliament), just as in Hungary, which are a veritable
“sign of contradiction” to the globalists in Brussels, in Whitehall, and in New
York and Washington.
Both Putin and Viktor Orban
remind us of who we have been, our inheritance, our Christian traditions and
belief, and just maybe who we could become once again if we keep the faith and
attack our enemies with strategic intelligence and a passion like a Nathan
Bedford Forrest.
Both the Left and the “kept”
conservative pseudo-opposition to it, either frontally or implicitly oppose and
attack our heritage…two heads of the same coin. They both must be rejected.
So, if Donald Trump doesn’t run
for president in 2024, since essential American citizenship is being abolished
by Biden, I’m voting for Vladimir Putin. I’d like to see how the Cossacks
handle the BLM and Antifa terrorists!
Forget Trump - he folded when it mattered!
ReplyDelete