March 12, 2020
MY CORNER by Boyd
Russia Now Proclaims a "Belief in God to be Fundamental," while the US Embraces Paganism
Friends,
Over the past six years I have written several
essays and in-depth articles about Russia, about its president Vladimir Putin,
and about the incredibly long-lived charade—the Russia Hoax—which has been
foisted off on the American public, including on millions of those who call
themselves “conservatives” and support Donald Trump.
It’s a constant narrative that we are spoon fed
nightly, and not just by the Mainstream Media (e.g., CNN, NBC, The New York
Times, etc.), but vociferously by most pundits on Fox (with the exception of
Tucker Carlson) and by much of the establishment “conservative” print media.
As I have noted and attempted to dissect, it
is almost as if the fall of Soviet Communism in August 1991 never took place
and the old Soviet Union somehow continued to exist and threaten our very lives
and future with
“mutually-assured-destruction” (remember that term from our Cold War vocabulary?).
“mutually-assured-destruction” (remember that term from our Cold War vocabulary?).
Despite the nugatory results of the heavily
Democratically-weighted Mueller Commission and the continued hysterical sqwawks of
Congressmen Adam Schiff and Jerry Nadler—what does it tell us about our
American political system that such men get elected?-- the success of that template in our popular culture is
clearly evident.
But more than this resilient deep-seated
impression, there is something far more sinister afoot.
The late Senator John McCain—notoriously—and Senators Lindsey Graham and Ben Sasse, James
Kirchick, Jonah Goldberg, and other Neoconservatives—those who form the
veritable “conservative establishment” in our day—have attacked and criticized
Russia and its president for “violations of human rights,” for discrimination
against lesbians and homosexuals, for imposing a “religious orthodoxy” on
Russia, and for “not being democratic” enough.
In other words, those Russkies should be more like
us and our model democracy, right?
That is, a system here in the United States where
elections are bought and sold by major corporate and international
billionaires, a system where George Soros can pour in millions of dollars to a
targeted local race and convince (via ads and TV) voters to elect his chosen
candidate (e.g., in Virginia, Pennsylvania, etc.), a system where the
liberal-dominated courts refuse to countenance even the most minor voter ID
conditions, a system where two giant incestuous power groups (Democrats and
Republicans) literally control the real choices we have…that model democracy.
We officiously want the Russians to install that? We demand—in the name of
“democracy” and “human rights”—that our corrupt model be their model. And in so demanding we follow along exactly the
pathway of the George Soros’s of this world and the other anxious globalists
for whom any real sign of independence, of attachment to national and native
traditions, of true religious belief, and of adherence to moral law is anathema
and verboten in the New World Order.
There is a reason why the
Neoconservative/Conservative “establishment” and the Progressivists are joined
at the hip when it comes to post-Communist Russia: and it is that what has
occurred and is occurring there is an embarrassment and a reminder of what we
once aspired to—a reminder of what Western Christian civilization once held to
be fundamental—a reminder of what our historic culture was actually based on
and in. What Russia has been doing and achieving cannot be allowed to stand,
and certainly it cannot be described in any fair or faithful manner by
Mainstream Media, lest the veil and scales on our eyes by removed.
For Russia has become, ironically, a veritable
“sign of contradiction,” a sign that should shame us and shame this American
nation, the proclaimed “home of freedom and liberty” founded on immutable
principles based in a belief in God and His Providence…and look what has
happened to us now.
I pass on two short items: first, a short
abbreviated item on new constitutional changes in Russia—where on “conservative
media” [sic!] have you heard these mentioned? Maybe those “conservative
pundits” don’t want you to know…
Second, I offer another of my essays that appeared
on LewRockwell.com, “They’re Coming to Get You! Build that Bomb Shelter Now!”
Russia passes Constitutional Reform
Mar
11th 2020 5:13AM
MOSCOW (AP) — The Russian parliament approved a sweeping constitutional
reform in the third and final reading Wednesday, a move that will allow
President Vladimir Putin to stay in power for another 12 years after his
current term ends in 2024. [….]
The constitutional reform passed by the Duma on Wednesday would allow
Putin to run for presidency two more times after 2024. Ahead of the national
vote, it will be reviewed by Russia's Constitutional Court.
The changes redistribute the executive powers of the
Russian government in Moscow and further strengthen the power of the
presidency, while also banning same-sex marriage, prohibiting public homosexual
displays, insisting on traditional religious instruction in Russian schools and
armed forces, and listing “a belief in God” as one of Russia's fundamental
values.
They’re Coming to Get You! Build that Bomb Shelter NOW!
Right after the installment of MY CORNER of February 14 appeared, it was picked up
and published nationally by LewRockwell.com. It was almost as if some
well-placed Intel spook had met with me at “Rick’s Café Americain” (remember
the film “Casablanca”?) and secretly revealed what was going to happen. The “Russia
Hoax” was going to be fully reborn (in fact, as I wrote, it had never gone
away). Like Dr. Frankenstein’s monster it emerged again from our corrupted and
corrupt Intelligence agencies (those government apparatchiks who are beginning
to make Inspector Clouseau look like a genius) and the bowels of the
frenetically ideological New York Times (and those poisoned zombie-brains
in Congress, e.g. Adam Schiff). The Mueller Commission, try as it did, couldn’t
find anything substantive because there isn’t and wasn’t anything there, save
for the putrid defecation of three years of strenuous Deep State
“investigation.” But with the crop of Establishment Democrat candidates for
president looking increasingly like a lesser version the Keystone Kops,
something—anything—had to be found, some additional obstacle, some roadblock to
stop “the Donald,” and much more dangerously, the counter-revolution that he
has (at times, quite unwittingly) unleashed.
How better to do this than have the
president’s own Director of National Intelligence, along with his Deep State
ideological “Intel savants” (a true oxymoron!), brief Schiff and top Democrats,
and without the president even knowing it! Ha! Talk about your own
team sabotaging you—anyone remember those words of Julius Caesar: “Et tu, Brute?” And you also,
Brutus? But it doesn’t take a Shakespeare play to instruct us
on what is going on. As I have repeated too many times to count, President
Trump’s major problem is that he has surrounded himself with Neoconservative
and Deep State minions who diametrically oppose his announced agenda, and they
have done everything possible—with some real success, especially in foreign
affairs—to stymy and obstruct it.
Those once highly regarded
agencies—the FBI, the CIA, the NSA—haven’t gotten much right since they
officiously proclaimed from on high their dogmatic, infallible judgment about
“weapons of mass destruction” hiding in Saddam Hussein’s outdoor outhouse.
Their active immersion in the government-engineered plot to bring down a president—the
Steele Dossier, the inveigling of General Flynn, Roger Stone, George
Papadopoulos, etc., their use of British “intelligence” (the Brits stopped
having “intelligence” after Enoch Powell’s warnings about unlimited immigration
were ignored)—has revealed for anyone with eyes to see the fact that, at least
in the upper echelons, those agencies form an integral part, an active arm of
the managerial state apparatus that seeks to strangle any real dissent or
opposition to its New World Order designs.
Even
so-called “conservatives”—the Neoconservatives, whom I often criticize—accept
the Russia boogeyman narrative. But it’s not so much Trump who is the target,
it seems, but in their version the Russkies are just warmed-over Communists who
want to “destroy our democracy.” The Cold War, in their pygmy-sized brains,
continues unabated, and even the vaunted Rush Limbaugh has very real difficulty
distinguishing the Communist Soviet Union and post-1991 Russia. Flying in the
face of subsequent history and fact, he uses the terms interchangeably: true,
palpable historical ignorance on parade. For him and the zealous Neocon
interventionists it is still October 1962 and we are still mired in the Cuban
Missile Crisis, although now it has been miraculously transposed over to
Ukraine. Just ask John Bolton (or the late, unlamented John McCain).
The other
night I made myself listen to “Special Report with Bret Baier,” where the Fox
News “All Stars” held forth, fully accepting the Hoax—yes, of course, they
solemnly declared, the Russians are messing with and meddling in our 2020
election cycle, just like in 2016. The Intel folks—whose probity and
diligence cannot be doubted!—say so. And Chris Wallace (who is by no means a
“conservative” of any flavor) pronounced to Ed Henry on another segment that
very simply “we must take these active threats very, very seriously. The
Russians are AGAIN manipulating our elections.”
Got that?
I almost
regretted not signing up with that contractor who offered to build me a bomb
shelter in my ample back yard. For only $125,000 he could construct for me an
underground bunker that would withstand those incoming Russian MiGs….
Suddenly, I was put in mind of that
satirical film from 1964, Dr. Strangelove. And I wondered if, echoing Peter
Sellers in that scintillating cinema, the likes of Bolton, Bill Kristol, Max
Boot, and those agents of Russophobia who now surround the president and have
turned our Intel agencies and Congress into little more than a herd of docile
bovines (with the connivance of all our television networks), we would finally
see and experience the “Doomsday Weapon” (as in the final scene of the film).
Although
from somewhat different perspectives and viewpoints, Establishment Conservatism
(i.e, the Neocons) and the Left have made post-Communist Russia their target.
Yet, the major threat by far—very far—is what the actually Communist Chinese
are doing and have done. Adam Schiff doesn’t talk about that, and neither do
most politicians or major American big name capitalists, because the Chinese
Reds already own and dominate so much of this country’s infrastructure and
business.
And the
fact—still mostly hidden from most Americans—that post-1991 Russia has actually
turned towards its traditional religious faith and conservative (especially
moral) traditions doesn’t go over well with the transgender-pushing, pro-same
sex marriage establishment which dominates both political parties, both
Leftwing AND Conservative, here in the United States. Recall John McCain
bitterly criticizing Vladimir Putin for his “persecution” and suppression of
lesbians (i.e., “Pussy Riot”) and same sex supporters in Mother Russia?
This is what Mainstream Conservatism
has become: a sordid and decrepit second cousin of the rapidly advancing
Leftist juggernaut. And, once again, I quote Robert Lewis Dabney’s apposite
words:
This is a party which never conserves
anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the
progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of
growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the
resisted novelty of yesterday is to-day one of the accepted principles of
conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next
innovation, which will to-morrow be forced upon its timidity, and will be
succeeded by some third revolution, to be denounced and then adopted in its
turn.
American
conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward
towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always
advances near its leader. This pretended salt hath utterly lost its savor:
wherewith shall it he salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It
is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of
sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious, for the sake of the
truth, and has no idea of being guilty of the folly of martyrdom. It
always—when about to enter a protest—very blandly informs the wild beast whose
path it essays to stop, that its ‘bark is worse than its bite,’ and that it
only means to save its manners by enacting its decent rôle of resistance.
The
only practical purpose which it now subserves in American politics is to give
enough exercise to Radicalism to keep it ‘in wind,’ and to prevent its becoming
pursy and lazy from having nothing to whip. No doubt, after a few years, when
women’s suffrage shall have become an accomplished fact, conservatism will
tacitly admit it into its creed, and thenceforward plume itself upon its wise
firmness in opposing with similar weapons the extreme of baby suffrage; and
when that too shall have been won, it will be heard declaring that the
integrity of the American Constitution requires at least the refusal of
suffrage to asses. There it will assume, with great dignity, its final position.
As we
hurdle on to diabolical moral degradation in America, each step worse than the
last, even though our masters tell us not to worry and just accept it, our
supposed opponents in Moscow, Kazan and Novgorod recover and celebrate their
Christian and moral beliefs and inheritance.
What
irony! Is this not a full exemplification of Gilbert and Sullivan’s image of
“topsy-turvy”?
And for
the American traditionalist, for the orthodox Christian, to quote Patrick
Buchanan: “On whose side is God NOW on?
**********
Reprinted with the author’s permission.
No comments:
Post a Comment