November 5, 2018
MY CORNER by Boyd
Cathey
My Latest Published
Essay in CHRONICLES MAGAZINE: From Silent Sam to Screaming Selfies
Friends,
Today I pass along to you a copy of my latest essay published
in Chronicles magazine [“From Silent Sam to Screaming Selfies,” November
2018 issue]. Chronicles is arguably
the dean and intellectual lodestar of Old Right traditional conservatism. This
is the fourth essay that I’ve had the honor to publish there (two in print, two
online), and I deeply appreciate the confidence of the journal’s editors who
have chosen to run my writing.
For those who do not know the magazine, here is a
brief description of its history and objectives
[ https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/about/]:
For nearly four decades, The Rockford Institute’s flagship
monthly,
Chronicles: A Magazine of American Culture, edited by Chilton Williamson, Jr., Scott P. Richert, and Aaron D. Wolf, has defended Western Christian civilization. A magazine without peer, Chronicles aims to influence the influential. Nearly a third of its readers hold advanced degrees and include novelists, filmmakers, university professors, teachers, homeschooling mothers, captains of industry, government researchers, journalists, bishops, priests, and politicians. Former presidential candidate Patrick J. Buchanan called Chronicles “the toughest, best-written, and most insightful journal in America.” One venture capitalist described Chronicles as more useful in predicting social and cultural trends than all investment newsletters combined, and a best-selling thriller writer calls Chronicles “the magazine I read first.”
Chronicles: A Magazine of American Culture, edited by Chilton Williamson, Jr., Scott P. Richert, and Aaron D. Wolf, has defended Western Christian civilization. A magazine without peer, Chronicles aims to influence the influential. Nearly a third of its readers hold advanced degrees and include novelists, filmmakers, university professors, teachers, homeschooling mothers, captains of industry, government researchers, journalists, bishops, priests, and politicians. Former presidential candidate Patrick J. Buchanan called Chronicles “the toughest, best-written, and most insightful journal in America.” One venture capitalist described Chronicles as more useful in predicting social and cultural trends than all investment newsletters combined, and a best-selling thriller writer calls Chronicles “the magazine I read first.”
I
hope you will consider subscribing. Each monthly issue is filled with thoughtful
and well-written essays addressing the major issues of our time, excellent
reviews, and acute commentary. For print subscriptions [one years, $44.99],
please write: CHRONICLES Subscription
Department, P. O. Box 3247, Northbrook, Illinois 60065-9968, or: https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/my-account/subscribe/.
My
published November 2018 essay, “From Silent Sam to Screaming Selfies,” may be
found both in the print edition and also online (for subscribers, log in at: https://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/2018/November/43/11/magazine/article/10845670/].
The
essay is largely a rewriting of an installment of MY CORNER from August 26 of
this year which addressed the toppling of the “Silent Sam” monument on the
campus of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the deeper
implications; [http://boydcatheyreviewofbooks.blogspot.com/2018/08/august-26-2018-my-corner-by-boydcathey.html]
CHRONICLES
November
2018
Letter From North Carolina
From
Silent Sam to Screaming Selfies
by Boyd D. Cathey
In the wake of the August 20 toppling of Silent
Sam, a monument to North Carolina students
who volunteered to become Confederate soldiers in 1861-65, our television
screens were filled with images of scraggly, rough-bearded Millennial men and
unkempt women screaming profanities and shouting imprecations about racism,
white supremacy, and the dangers of “fascism.” Which is to say, they were
“demonstrating for peace and justice.” Silent Sam, a symbol of courage, sacrifice, and duty, has stood on the
campus of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill for over 100 years.
News accounts showed the figure lying on the ground, as members of the mob took
turns kicking at it and spitting on it, and taking selfies while doing so.
Behind those fierce images of anarchy lurked a darker, scarier truth.
Admittedly, some members of the mob of
August 20—a number of whom came back to demonstrate again on Saturday, August
25—were not really students. They were professional itinerant militants from
Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and other Marxist groups. But many indeed were
enrollees at that institution—students who are by most accounts receiving the
finest public education that money (and Mommy and Daddy) can buy from one of
the most prestigious universities in the South.
There was, for example, Margarita
Sitterson, a Chapel Hill student who is the granddaughter of former chancellor
of the university J. Carlyle Sitterson. As reported by Big League Politics,
she boasted of her participation in the lawlessness of August 20 and her active
involvement in tearing down the monument:
“So basically what happened was there was four banners on
each side—well actually one banner on each side, and they were all connected by
sticks, and people wrapped rope around the sticks and we pulled back and forth
and back and forth until it fell down.”
Sitterson flippantly added a reference
to her lineage:
“My grandfather—he went here for college, then he became a
professor, then he became a dean [inaudible], then he became chancellor.”
Sitterson said she was ashamed and that she carried guilt because she is white,
and white people owned slaves.
The narrative is familiar: It conforms
to the instructional template that frames nearly every course on American
history, literature, and politics on offer at today’s institutions of higher
learning. This framework admits two measures by which all human history and
experience, all human knowledge and expression, are to be evaluated: racial
oppression by the white race of black and brown people, and sexual oppression
by men of women. Thus, reading our history and literature to discover deeply
embedded examples of “racism” and “white supremacy,” and of “male exploitation”
and the “oppression of women,” has become the central characteristic of the
college-classroom experience. Shakespeare, a white male, glorified the
abasement and enslavement of women and degraded nonwhites in Richard III and The Merchant of Venice.
Mozart’s Die Entführung Aus Dem Serail and Rossini’s L’italiana
in Algeri demonstrate an overtly racist hostility
to Muslims and women. The Adventures of Tom Sawyer, Gone With the Wind, the Uncle Remus stories of Joel Chandler Harris: These are
almost too triggering to mention.
When such works are taught and
discussed in our universities, they are accompanied by grim warnings. This
treatment of the patrimony of our civilization effectively cuts students off
from the past and from the shared culture that shapes our collective identity
as a people.
Obviously, when students like Margarita
Sitterson arrive in the classrooms of Cultural Marxist ideologues who will do
little more than inculcate the theories of “critical race theory” and the
“feminization of history,” they have already, in most cases, endured years of
poor education and early indoctrination in our public schools. They have been
“softened up” for this process. These arriving freshmen, while able to describe
in excruciating detail what they have been told about the “racism” and “white
oppression” supposedly existent in the United States today, cannot read basic
texts or pass basic exams in math, English, and history.
In late 2016, Dr. Walter Williams wrote
that “a very large percentage of all incoming [college] freshmen have no
business being admitted to college.” After taking the College Board test,
Only 32 percent of white students scored at or above
proficient in math, and just 7 percent of black students did. Forty-six percent
of white test takers scored proficient in reading, and 17 percent of blacks
did. The ACT, another test used for admission to college, produced similar
results. The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education reports, in
an article titled “A Major Crisis in College Readiness for Black Students,”
that 34 percent of whites who took the ACT were deemed college-ready in all four
areas—English, mathematics, reading and science. For blacks, it was only 6
percent.
This educational rot extends to the
U.S. Military. The 2019 National Defense Authorization Act signed by President
Trump and financed by a $670 billion defense-spending measure approved in
September calls for an increase of 15,000 active-duty troops in 2019. This
comes following a year in which the Army failed to meet its recruiting goal for
the first time since 2005. There is a bigger problem: In addition to the fact that
many potential candidates are too obese to meet the physical requirements of
the military, many more are too dumb. As Mark Perry writes at The American Conservative’s
website,
one in four cannot meet minimal educational standards (a
high school diploma or GED equivalent), and one in 10 have [sic] a criminal history. In plain terms, about 71 percent of
18-to-24-year-olds (the military’s target pool of potential recruits) are
disqualified from the minute they enter a recruiting station: that’s 24 million
out of 34 million Americans. . . . [F]ully 30 percent of those who have the
requisite high school diploma or GED equivalent fail to pass the Armed Forces
Qualification Test (the AFQT), which is used to determine math and reading
skills.
Given the wretched state of American
education today, is it any wonder that rowdy mobs of students spouting Cultural
Marxist slogans are answering the call of their leftist teachers and college
professors to destroy Confederate symbols? And since they are glorified as courageous
defenders of “free speech” and “social justice” by the media and Democratic
politicians, what is their incentive to stop? Taught to hate everything, they
will remain angry and restless until they obliterate every vestige of Western
Christian civilization.
The administrators at the University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill, like the administrators at most colleges
throughout the country, have yet to comprehend the depths of this problem;
indeed, many of them sympathize with the young lunatics. Too many political and
civic leaders continue to bury their heads in the sand, look the other way, or
hope the problem will just go away. But it won’t. Cultural Marxism is a rapidly
spreading cancer that must be
excised and removed—else it will kill
the host body.
At
stake is the very existence of our civilization and our identity as a people.
*****
Boyd D. Cathey holds a Ph.D. in European
History from the Catholic University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain, where he was
a Richard Weaver Fellow, and an M.A. in Intellectual History from the
University of Virginia. He was an assistant to the late Russell Kirk and served
as state registrar of the North Carolina Division of Archives and History. His
book The Land We Love: The South and Its
Heritage is forthcoming in November 2018.
No comments:
Post a Comment